Between Therapist and Client
About this deal
Similarity of modality structure between therapists and clients has already been demonstrated to be an important predictor of the establishment of rapport in early psychotherapy. So I guess this means it was written for trainees like me and it put me to sleep several times (just as basic Freud did). To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Kahn gives a short but useful outline of the history of psychoanalysis, client-centered therapy and a few in-between points of view. Gives a flavour of each of the key players in the movement, and has a good selection of recommended further reading as epilogue.
Recently, the SPI has been shown to have even higher reliability scores than previously demonstrated, and, through a correlation with the Vocational Preference Inventory, validity has been established for the Affects, Sensations, Imagery, and Interpersonal Relations modalities, with some indication of validity established for the Behaviors modality. Khan moves from the medical/mechanistic style to one focused on the relationship between therapist and client as a main agent of change. When therapists met with their next new client for the first time, they were instructed to explain the study and seek the client's consent for participation. Easy to read, author is very clear, it is a great book for trainee therapist but also for clients and people in general who want to understand more about the relationship between therapist and client.It is so easy to read and understand and a great introduction to what can happen between therapist and client.
It's not really written for professions who have their license because they should already know this stuff. I did learn some things from the reading and it certainly has me questioning myself and what I do in the room with clients (which is a good thing).Thus, even if therapists choose the same techniques and practice psychotherapy exactly the same regardless of their philosophical orientation, it appears that the techniques will be presented more clearly, be more “on target,” and have a greater degree of efficacy when therapists and clients are more similar in their modality orientation.
In Between Therapist and Client, Michael Kahn explores what is perhaps the most important aspect of therapy -- the therapist-client relationship.It helped me consolidate my understanding of the importance of empathy, transference and counter transference to therapeutic outcomes. The author deeply appreciates the contributions of the following to the preparation of this study: John A. The position favoring similarity appears to have evolved from observations that therapist and client demographic and personality characteristics such as gender, race, personality, and mental health have a “profound impact” on psychotherapeutic process and outcome. found that when therapists and clients agreed in their recollections of which session events were important, psychotherapy sessions were generally rated as more effective by both clients and therapists.
It may be difficult to fathom generalizing from a subject pool of 19 therapist–client pairs to the field of psychotherapy in general. Therapist–client similarity was not found to be predictive of clients' initial levels of psychopathology in analyses of intake GSI scores ( R = 0.Most analysts abandoned the role of detached and silent, which is both a relieve for themselves and the patient. Herman SM: Therapist–client similarity on the Multimodal Structural Profile Inventory as a predictor of early session impact. Scale scores can range from 5 (indicating poor functioning in the modality area or a preference against using that sphere of functioning) to 35 points (indicating high functioning in the modality area or a preference to use that sphere of functioning, that is, a dominant modality).